The numbers work against offshore wind Offshore wind developers, green energy proponents and governmental officials including Governor Murphy continue to publicize and promote false information regarding economic benefits to our state and counties from these projects. It’s estimated by the NJ Council on the Green Economy that in the next 10 years offshore wind will create over 9,500 jobs per year. That’s a persuasive number to the public and politicians, designed to deceive them and to quiet opposition. Analyses and facts reveal the truth: These projects are being imposed on our coastline without regard of any harmful consequences or consideration of any reasonable alternatives (such as micro-nuclear, for example).
Atlantic Shores LLC is a good example of a company that is not guaranteeing jobs. The offshore wind industry is a rapidly growing sector, and with this growth comes the need for skilled workers. The offshore wind industry is expected to create millions of jobs globally.
This disparity highlights the significant economic impact of tourism on coastal communities, particularly in Atlantic and Ocean counties. The tourism industry in these counties is a major driver of economic activity, generating billions of dollars in revenue and supporting thousands of jobs. The impact of tourism on coastal communities is multifaceted, encompassing economic, social, and environmental aspects.
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy has grossly overstepped his office authority by using an executive order to implement a 100-year “environmental” plan (REAL) that anticipates catastrophic sea level increases by the year 2100. He is completely bypassing the state Legislature by using his appointed Department of Environment Protection, a group of his handpicked cronies, to do his bidding. Such far-reaching restrictions require the full weight of the legislative branch, not just the opinion of Murphy and his cronies. Perhaps it is time for municipalities to lawyer up and get ready for a serious battle that has immense financial, economic and social consequences. Dictating such a policy is deplorable. Thousands of local homeowners would be forced to buy flood insurance at a cost of thousands of dollars.
He has a history of pushing for policies that are not supported by the public or by scientific evidence. ## Summary
The summary provided focuses on the concerns surrounding the proposed regulations and the track record of the individual advocating for them. It highlights the lack of data to support the radical nature of the proposed regulations and the potential for harm. The summary also criticizes the individual’s history of pushing for policies that are not supported by the public or scientific evidence.
Then I believe, this same company’s executives and managers committed a federal and state crime known as extortion by telling residents that if you don’t agree to having a smart meter installed, you will have to pay an additional $15 per month. I believe there is a possibility of blackmail being committed as well. Since they are a utility and in the state of New Jersey, where our governor and attorney general shaft us all the time, no one should be surprised. Where are the State Police or the FBI now? David Barsky Atlantic City
